On 4/21/15 7:51 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > I think this would be overkill. Of course it depends on the frequency > of the times this happens. My guess is a very small 0.001 or > something like that percentage. That's probably the case but it still seems to be a problem (I've had it happen, as well). I think part of this is cultural and a failure to understand IETF process (i.e. creating bogus, orchestrated support for moving a document along), but it may be worthwhile, at some point, to create a mechanism for a "coauthor" to either take a draft down or expire it early. Not a high priority. Melinda