Re: Drafts that can't be serious

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Loyd please refrain.

Thank you
joel

On 4/21/15 3:36 PM, l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> All participants are not equal, as you have repeatedly demonstrated...
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> on behalf of Abdussalam Baryun
> <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 22 April 2015 8:15:57 AM
> *To:* Doug Ewell
> *Cc:* ietf@xxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: Drafts that can't be serious
>  
> 
> 
> On Monday, April 20, 2015, Doug Ewell <doug@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:doug@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     >From "New and Revived Drafts" this morning:
> 
>     Is there a filter that the IETF can apply to defer the posting of drafts
>     like this until the next April 1?
> 
> 
> Usually most volunteering organisations have filters for their incoming
> information (filtering information but not filtering participation), the
> best practice in communication is to have many techniques to improve
> IETF's information system. All participants are equal but all
> information are not. 
> 
> AB


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]