Re: Drafts that can't be serious

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Drafts that can't be serious
From: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:40:47 +0900
Cc: IETF Disgust <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <6AB903E208C85C0838FC168D@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

i suggest we focus on producing good, well-engineered, internet drafts.
being an internet police person is boring; and they do not even let you
use guns.

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Drafts that can't be serious
  - From: manning

References:
- Drafts that can't be serious
  - From: Doug Ewell
- Re: Drafts that can't be serious
  - From: John C Klensin

Prev by Date: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01
Next by Date: Re: Drafts that can't be serious
Previous by thread: Re: Drafts that can't be serious
Next by thread: Re: Drafts that can't be serious
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]