>Actually, this might be the start of a real problem. The ietf.org >has a great page rank value. Getting your domain into a url into >a draft on the IETF site has value. In this case, I noticed two >URLs that we would never put in real drafts, things to personal >domains where real authors would use "example.com". That's a very >simple objective rule that can be enforced. If we don't, we might >end up attracting spammers in attempts to bring up their page >ranking on search engines. I would strongly suggest not making up new rules to solve problems that do not currently exist and probably never will. Two I-D's from someone who doesn't understand the IETF does not make a crisis, and there are much easier ways to do SEO gaming than to write fake drafts. I have always found the vast majority of drafts that go by aren't interesting to me because they're in areas I don't work in and don't understand very well. Skipping a few more because they're incoherent isn't a problem. On the other hand, a little grepping of the I-D directory finds 30 drafts with references to one of my personal domains, most in drafts I did not write, and all in drafts that people would consider to be serious. I don't mind, but I expect your new robot might. R's, John