> On Apr 18, 2015, at 7:10 PM, Hector Santos <hsantos@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 4/18/2015 3:59 AM, t.p. wrote: >> I find it worse than that. Just over a year ago, Martin Rex said, about >> an upgrade to a different IETF server, >> >> "Using IE6 to test a web page is perfectly reasonable. >> >> If it doesn't work in IE6, it uses more complex/esoteric features >> than what is necessary and should be used in the first place. > > I understand, and once upon a time that was very true, but I think by this point in browser history time, its closer to IE9 as a minimum for the windows world of end user support. According to this, we should support at least IE8: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2&qpcustomd=0 And for similar reasons Safari 7.1, and if we care about mobile, Safari 3.1 for iOS and Android browser 3.1. Yoav