> 18 apr 2015 kl. 09:59 skrev t.p. <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > I find it worse than that. Just over a year ago, Martin Rex said, about > an upgrade to a different IETF server, > > "Using IE6 to test a web page is perfectly reasonable. > ...oh for the love of html5... > If it doesn't work in IE6, it uses more complex/esoteric features > than what is necessary and should be used in the first place. I (and I'm sure I speak for anyone who has written code for the web in the last 5 odd years) object to using that criterion. It used to be ... practical, but this time is long past. > > The server obviously fails the golden IETF rule "be conservative > in what you send out" (as HTML) and the server ought to be fixed" > > I have performed the test. It fails, comprehensively. > > Tom Petch > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Hector Santos" <hsantos@xxxxxxxx> > To: <ietf@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 6:24 PM > >> Minor comment: >> >> The site breaks down in certain spots when Javascript is disabled >> which is always off for me until I specifically white list the site. >> Disabling javascript also helps with speed, throughput. >> >> The menu is lost when javascript is disabled. It does say "Enable >> Javacript for full functionality." Using CSS for the menu solves this >> problem. >> >> Overall, retest site with Javascript disabled to find the problem >> points and to gracefully clean it up. >> >> -- >> HLS >> >>> On 4/13/2015 6:21 PM, Benson Schliesser wrote: >>> I agree - it looks much more modern, and more pleasant to look at. >>> Thank you to everybody that made this happen! >>> >>> But since nobody has complained yet (and IMHO complaining is a >>> particular skill of the IETF...) please allow me to be the first: > I'd >>> like a more "compact" view of the WG document list. Perhaps my > memory >>> is tricking me, but I feel like I was able to see more in a single >>> screen with the old style. I suppose I could try to submit code... > But >>> complaining is easier. ;) >>> >>> Regardless, to be clear about my dominant feeling: Thanks to the > team >>> that did this, and everybody that makes Datatracker work! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -Benson >>> >>> >>>> Joel M. Halpern <mailto:jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> April 13, 2015 at 6:11 PM >>>> Very impressive. Congratulations to Lars. >>>> Yours, >>>> Joel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Tony Hansen <mailto:tony@xxxxxxx> >>>> April 13, 2015 at 6:02 PM >>>> On 4/13/15 5:49 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: >>>> >>>> Kudos to Lars! >>>> >>>> Tony Hansen >>>> Robert Sparks <mailto:rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> April 13, 2015 at 5:49 PM >>>> All - >>>> >>>> The upgrade to the datatracker UI mentioned in plenary at IETF 92 >>>> has just been released. >>>> >>>> This effort has been underway for more than a year. >>>> >>>> Lars Eggert began the effort, working intensively on porting the > GUI >>>> to Bootstrap. >>>> >>>> The work took 287 separate commits, and comprised changes to 1016 >>>> different files. >>>> >>>> The IETF Datatracker is now a responsive website which supports use >>>> on a much larger variety of devices, from small mobile devices to >>>> desktops. >>>> >>>> The work relies heavily on the capabilities of Bootstrap, and >>>> continues to use the Django framework which the datatracker has > been >>>> built on since version 2.00. It also uses new icons from >>>> FontAwesome, functions from django-bootstrap3. >>>> >>>> Additional page conversion work has been done by Ole Laursen, and >>>> final style tweaks, bug-fixes and adaptations were performed by >>>> Henrik Levkowetz. >>>> >>>> There is more information about this release at >>>> http://tracker.tools.ietf.org/release/about >>>> >>>> As before the best way to report any issues with the datatracker is >>>> to follow the "Report a Bug" link in the footer of each page. >>>> >>>> Please join me in thanking Lars for this major effort! >>>> >>>> RjS >