On 04/10/2015 07:44, Doug Ewell wrote: > So, as many folks have been saying, by all means provide the more-secure > option for users who want it — but don't use that as a reason to take > away the existing option for other people who depend on it. That sounds like words to live by/a sound operating principle. Someone fire up the T-shirt press. -- Ted Faber http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature