Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sacm-use-cases-09

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Alexey for the review. I'll get your requested change made. I need to work out how best to do this at this stage.

Thanks,
Dave

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 8, 2015, at 10:02 AM, "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> My apologies for the very late review.
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> This review is in response to a request for early Gen-ART review.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-sacm-use-cases-09
> Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
> Review Date: 2015-04-08
> IETF LC End Date: 2015-03-16
> IESG Telechat date: 2015-04-09
> 
> Summary: Ready
> 
> Major Concerns: None
> 
> Minor Concerns: None
> 
> Nits:
> 
> In Section 2.1.1:
> 
> >*  Guidance that specifies how old collected data can be to be
> >           used for evaluation.
> 
> Either delete "can be" or "to be".
> 
> 






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]