On 4/8/2015 5:22 AM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote: > Many reviewers use a "major issues", "minor issues", "editorial issues" > organization. It helps to start with a /very/ concise summary of the nature of the document. What is it for? What does it do? How does it do it? This establishes that your understanding of the document matches what the author(s) intended. My own approach to commenting, after that, is to summarize the major issues in some free text, after the summary, and then to provide a single set of in-line comments of the document. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net