Re: Help with tools/process to review a draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/8/2015 5:22 AM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
> Many reviewers use a "major issues", "minor issues", "editorial issues"
> organization.


It helps to start with a /very/ concise summary of the nature of the
document.  What is it for?  What does it do?  How does it do it?  This
establishes that your understanding of the document matches what the
author(s) intended.

My own approach to commenting, after that, is to summarize the major
issues in some free text, after the summary, and then to provide a
single set of in-line comments of the document.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]