Re: Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Max,

On 28/03/15 13:47, Massimiliano Pala wrote:
> I think that allowing this as a common practice is a bit dangerous.

What danger do you perceive here? I'm not seeing it. Nor do I see any
need at all for an "official" IETF-wide position, and in fact, such a
position is quite likely to be counterproductive IMO.

And as Phill said, re-numbering, if it breaks code, isn't a good
plan. Asking if it would break code, etc. on the trans list, is a
totally reasonable question btw and that discussion is already
happening there.

S.

PS: This isn't about a MIB, but a PKI thing.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]