Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Maybe introduce a new state 'Other AD' which would be set
> automatically if an AD has not entered a ballot but another in their
> area has.
> 
> So if there are three ADs and one enters a ACCEPT, her two colleagues
> state will be set to OTHER-AD. Then another reads the draft and
> decides it is a disaster area, they change their vote from OTHER-AD to
> DISCUSS.

I like that idea - it provides a no-action-required means for an AD
to not have to do anything about a draft, while assuring the community
that her Area has it covered, and setting the expectation that an AD
doing nothing about a draft is ok (because her colleague has it covered).

Nit: ACCEPT -> NO OBJECTION or YES.

Thanks,
--David






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]