t.p. <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Interesting to see this at the top of the list, a classic top-down
> management approach. Even in top-down managed organisations (which is
> not how I view the IETF), I see bottom-up review, which in this case
> would be the AD sitting down with the WG Chairs in their Area to say,
> how am I doing? I think that that would be a better fit for the IETF.
This is a good thing to do period.
But, I don't think it address strange/rude/inappropriate interactions that
seem to occur from my anecdotal observation in cross-area review, or between
peers rather than up-down.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature