Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



t.p. <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > Interesting to see this at the top of the list, a classic top-down
    > management approach.  Even in top-down managed organisations (which is
    > not how I view the IETF), I see bottom-up review, which in this case
    > would be the AD sitting down with the WG Chairs in their Area to say,
    > how am I doing?  I think that that would be a better fit for the IETF.

This is a good thing to do period.
But, I don't think it address strange/rude/inappropriate interactions that
seem to occur from my anecdotal observation in cross-area review, or between
peers rather than up-down.


-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]