On 3/26/2015 9:41 AM, Mary Barnes wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Michael StJohns <mstjohns@xxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:mstjohns@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: ... > And then there's > the whole confidentiality model the Nomcom and CBs are currently > tied to and how that would need to be morphed to enable this. > > [MB] And the latter is my biggest concern. I think this feedback model > has the potential to seriously compromise the Nomcom process. My > interpretation of the process as a past chair was that providing this > feedback actually violates the confidentiality of the Nomcom process. I > know it happens unofficially, but I don't think that's ideal. > [/MB] I do not understand the nature of this confidentiality concern. If nomcom interviews disclose a pattern of statement that AD Brute is confrontational and intimidating in their interactions style, then having a chat with the AD, describing the pattern of perceptions and the need for a softer and more respectful and more collaborative style, does not violate anyone's confidentiality. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net