Re: IDNA and U+08A1 and related cases (was: Re: Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-json-i-json-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IDNA and U+08A1 and related cases (was: Re: Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-json-i-json-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT))
From: Nico Williams <nico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 03:12:30 -0600
Cc: "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, Pete Resnick <presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "idna-update@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <idna-update@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, The IESG <iesg@xxxxxxxx>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <54C5FAD2.1010507@ix.netcom.com>

As far as I'm concerned it's clear that the correct way to handle these cases is: as confusables. Is this wrong?

Nick

--

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IDNA and U+08A1 and related cases (was: Re: Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-json-i-json-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT))
  - From: Asmus Freytag

Prev by Date: Re: IETF LC comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-10
Next by Date: REMINDER: IETF NOMCOM 2014 - deadline 2015-01-26 - Call for Nominations: 3rd ROUTING AREA DIRECTOR
Previous by thread: Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-drinks-spp-framework-09
Next by thread: Re: IDNA and U+08A1 and related cases (was: Re: Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-json-i-json-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]