Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:54:04 -0800
Cc: "<ietf@xxxxxxxx>" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CABmDk8nHOEsVxz9bF-Y+Mgbj4DCEKPZoOgtP8Wp7vFBAUWcVmg@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Reply-to: dcrocker@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0

On 1/15/2015 8:36 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
> IMHO, the workload issue could be much more effectively handled by
> taking better advantage of directorates.


+1   (well, really, +10)


d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  - From: Benoit Claise

References:
- IETF areas re-organisation steps
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  - From: Robert Sparks
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  - From: Alissa Cooper
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  - From: Robert Sparks
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
  - From: Mary Barnes

Prev by Date: Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-pechanec-pkcs11uri-16.txt> (The PKCS#11 URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard: new draft 19
Previous by thread: Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
Next by thread: Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]