Re: [saag] i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/11/15 10:54 PM, Nico Williams wrote:

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 05:28:30PM -0500, Salz, Rich wrote:

I'd go even further than that and just mandate MUST ASCII.
I don't know if the IETF is "allowed" to do that any more, but +1 for
the reasons you list.
I'm not sure if the IESG will agree to that...

Given that this particular member of the IESG has (successfully) argued vehemently for ASCII-only on multiple occasions in the recent past, I would say that your worries on that score are overdone. :-)

pr

--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]