Re: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response

To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 21:41:47 +0200
Cc: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>, "internal-cg@xxxxxxxxx" <internal-cg@xxxxxxxxx>, "draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response.all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response.all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, IETF-Discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <54AD89D3.7070103@gmail.com>

> Try "The WG consensus did not agree with including the recommendations.”

I’m happy with Brian’s formulation. Thanks.

Jari

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

References:
- last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  - From: Jari Arkko
- RE: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  - From: Milton L Mueller
- Re: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  - From: Jari Arkko
- RE: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  - From: Milton L Mueller
- Re: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
  - From: Brian E Carpenter