Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mark,

On 1/6/15 1:07 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Or one can delegate _http._tcp.example.net back to the
> servers for example.net or delegate it to the hosting
> provider and they can update the SRV records.
>

No doubt, and there are all sorts of other things one CAN do.  One
common configuration is for enterprise AD servers to be delegated _tcp
for any number of reasons.  Operationally this happens, and in large
sites it is not uncommon to see TCP-based queries because of it.  How
wide scale is the issue and is any performance hit acceptable?  That is
a fair question and difficult to answer.  It would be perfectly fine
with me if the WG had said, “ok, we'll just manage that delay; records
cache anyway.”  But that is not how discussions went.  Delay is
important.  But here again, I think we could use more analysis.  That
shouldn't hold up this draft, however.

Eliot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]