On 5 January 2015 at 21:18, Ben Laurie <benl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 5 January 2015 at 21:06, Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> The document contains no issues from a security perspective as it is >>>>> only creating LSA’s for new types of route selection metrics, time >>>>> instead of network hops. >>>> >>>> and the new lsas could not be used in path shortening attacks, right? >>> >>> this document only defines the format of the LSA’s it does >>> not talk about processing by the routing engines. >> >> so the secdir sees no need to warn about it. got it. </sarcasm> > > If secdir is going to warn about it through this process, then shortly Good grief. Surely. > the right place to do that is in the comments on the document that > does talk about processing by the routing engines?