Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
From: "John Levine" <johnl@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 3 Jan 2015 18:08:08 -0000
Cc: harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <54A7CDDC.8060003@alvestrand.no>
Organization:

>An erratum saying "the text points to appendixes that are actually in
>the ANSI standard it talks about" should be sufficient.

Done.  This makes two errata I have submitted for this RFC, which
should be enough.

R's,
John

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  - From: John Levine

References:
- Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
  - From: Harald Alvestrand

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
Previous by thread: Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
Next by thread: Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]