Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



On 11/15/14, 5:10 PM, Matthew Kerwin wrote:
> On 16/11/2014, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> On 16/11/2014 07:34, Yoav Nir wrote:
>>> 
>>> Imagine Wikipedia with nothing controversial: nothing about
>>> abortions, religions, genetics, evolution…
>> 
>> And that will not happen, so Wikipedia will simply ignore "safe",
>> so browsers set to request "safe" will just get raw Wikipedia, so
>> "safe" will be useless for parents wishing to censor their
>> children's access to Wikipedia.
>> 
> 
> This straw man serves as a handy informative illustration.
> 
> Wikipedia doesn't (currently, or likely into the future) offer a
> 'safe' option.
> 
> Wikipedia doesn't offer a 'safe' option, so of course the hint
> isn't for them, so of course they will ignore it. Us standardising
> the preference doesn't suddenly force the entire web to present 
> safe/unsafe versions of everything.

But creating a standard may very well mean there will be a time where
they can't ignore it, and that concerns us. (this is the opposite of
the non-adoption of p3p and PICS, in a sense)

>> Thanks; this is a good illustration of why this whole thing is a
>> pointless fig leaf.
>> 
> 
> Once again, this hint is just a means of preempting the server's 
> question: "do you want safe mode?" The example that comes to mind
> is Google's 'safe search', which I presume is the naming
> phenotype.
> 
> If they don't ask the question, they can ignore the answer.
> 
> I wonder, again, if renaming it to "Prefer: x99-bob" would assuage 
> most peoples' concerns, at least had the renaming happened before 
> opinions were formed.

I don't think that would make a bit of difference. ::) It would
undoubtedly make it worse as people would use it for a myriad of other
bit expressions and then it would be essentially meaningless, but
standardized meaninglessness.

best, Joe

- -- 
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Chief Technologist
Center for Democracy & Technology
1634 I ST NW STE 1100
Washington DC 20006-4011
(p) 202-407-8825
(f) 202-637-0968
joe@xxxxxxx
PGP: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key
fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10  1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Darwin)
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=KCKW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]