> The DTN wg was approved a few days before this meeting. There was no agenda, no speakers,
the DTN meeting was on the agenda much earlier than that, and would have gone ahead as a(nother) BOF discussion even if the WG was not approved.
> Without them, we would not have a productive meeting.
two of the speakers were remote - out of three speakers.
this does suggest that no-one is in attendance in the wg, and that this wg is likely to be as dormant as dtnrg was. How many were in the room?
perhaps the time could be better used for a more active wg?
Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/dtn
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/dtn
> Début du message réexpédié :
>
>
> The DTN wg was approved a few days before this meeting. There was no agenda, no speakers, no reservation of meetecho service. We organize the meeting with 2 remote speakers. Meetecho people were nice to accept our late request, tested the speakers setup in advance and it worked flawlessly during the meeting. Without them, we would not have a productive meeting.
>
> Again, thanks Meetecho people. really appreciated.
>
> Regards, Marc (co-chair, dtn)