RE: earlier registration, suggestion for the next IETFs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



: Re: earlier registration, suggestion for the next IETFs
> 
> >All agreed, but we currently pick locations based on geographic
> >locality to participants - maybe picking them based on visa
> >availability for participants might be more useful?
> 
> I doubt that's going to be a productive route.  For people who live in
> the US, Canada, EU, Japan, Australia, and NZ, all those countries allow
> citizens of all of the others to travel without a visa, requiring at
> most an online un-visa (US and Australia.)  Beyond that, the rules are
> all over the place.  The US has soms unfortunate rules (good luck if
> you have a Cuban or Iranian passport) but even a normal visa often
> takes months if the consulate in the visitor's country is backed up.
> We might find a small country that has relaxed visa rules, but was more
> expensive to get to, the overall number of people who came might well
> be less.
> 
> Opening the registration earlier seems like something that wouldn't be
> very hard to do, and would be a boon to people who need visas.  By way
> of comparison, ICANN's next meeting is in February, and the
> registration has been open for a couple of weeks.
> 
> R's,
> John
> 
> PS: Wait until you see what the un-visa for Argentina involves.

I also think that opening the registration earlier would be easier than thinking about changing location with less visa limitation such as countries like Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, etc.

Thanks,
Best,
Hosnieh





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]