On 10/24/14 12:03 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 07:54:08AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> So I would like to see some sort of aspirational statement in the >> draft that the total size of the IESG should be kept as small as >> possible. The current 15 (+5 liaison/ex officio) is already >> too big IMNSHO. One is presupposing that a smaller IESG can do more by doing less. I'm sympathetic to that assertion but not confident of the outcome. I'm sympathetic to the draft because I believe the work should direct how and where we allocate the resources not a document we wrote 15 years ago. > I tend to agree with this, but perhaps we could incorporate by > reference http://profron.net/fun/Administratium.html. It seems to > have the right aspiration. > > A >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature