> > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "John Levine" <johnl@xxxxxxxxx> > > To: <ietf@xxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 3:06 PM > > > > This specification defines a "safe" preference for HTTP requests, > > > > expressing a desire to avoid "objectionable" content. > > > > > > I have read this draft and support its adoption. > > Me too. It seems a straightforward step in the right direction for the > > Internet at large. It is a small step but then taking small steps in > > the right direction is something that the IETF does rather well. > I have also read the draft, and while I'm not entirely enthusiastic about the > approach, it's quite clear this is going to happen regardless, and having a > standardized mechanism for it strikes me as a far superior situation than > having a bunch of nonstandard ways to do it deploy. > I also find the objections to adopting it I've seen so far to be lacking > foundation. > I therefore support adoption of this draft. Small point of clarification: By "approach" I meant the underlying apporach of having a safe mode, not the mechanism defined by the draft to control it. Poor word choice on my part; sorry. Ned