Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Will,

Where can I read (not slides) about how ICN handles routing, forwarding, buffering, network-level congestion, and contact predictability? Is there an RFC or good article about these?

Thanks,


J.Fraire
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina


On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:47 AM, William Ivancic <ivancic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Kevin,

Yes, I worked closely with this group.  Chart 19 says it all. Buy the way, don't confuse the need for DTN with the need for the Bundle protocol.  Chart 19 supports Wes' comments.  There is not way this group can deploy large networks without item 2.

Challenging network environment leads to link and network disruptions
  1. Need to develop a robust DTN based transport service
  2. Requires solutions to addressing, routing, management, discovery and forwarding/QOS
I have not seen this group actively participating on any of the DTN mail list in the past year or two or perhaps more.  Time flies.

Will



From: Kevin Fall <kfall@xxxxxxxxx>
To: William Ivancic <ivancic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>; Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@xxxxxxxxx>; "iab@xxxxxxx" <iab@xxxxxxx>; "iesg@xxxxxxxx" <iesg@xxxxxxxx>; Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "dtn@xxxxxxxx" <dtn@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?

Based on a meeting I recently attended and 2014 references such as this:

(http://nsrc.cse.psu.edu/talks_2014/thoughts_on_future_army_waveforms_20Mar2014.pdf)

I cannot share your conclusion.



_______________________________________________
dtn mailing list
dtn@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]