Re: [weirds] Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-json-response-10.txt> (JSON Responses for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)) to Proposed Standard

[Andy Newton <andy@xxxxxxxx>]

From: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, October 17, 2014 at 1:41 PM
To: "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, "iesg@xxxxxxxx" <iesg@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: "weirds@xxxxxxxx" <weirds@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Newton <andy@xxxxxxxx>, Scott Hollenbeck <shollenbeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [weirds] Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-json-response-10.txt> (JSON Responses for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)) to Proposed Standard

Just two nits:

Comment 1

In section 5.2 the term/phrase “first-class” as in "name server model” is used twice but never defined.

I don’t have a suggested fix.

It’s a generic term of art. Do we really want to be defining it in RFCs?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-class_citizen

Comment 2

While looking for something else, I noted one use of “secure DNSSEC” in section 14, probably meant “secure DNS” there.

Yup. Will fix.

-andy