Re: Media type for PGP message?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Subject: Re: Media type for PGP message? Date: Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:37:36AM -0700 Quoting ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx):
 
> So why not work towards the use of RFC 3156 signatures instead? Especially
> if your goal is to make this stuff more user-friendly.

I support this -- 3156, for all its warts, alleged or true, is implemented
in a few MUAs and works. FSVO works, but nothing else comes even close
today.

Mutt, my MUA, had a hell of grokking the first post; because the data
between the PGP markers was quite far from parseable as cryptotext. It
does that dreaded scanning, compared to which 3156 is elegant.

Regards, 
-- 
Måns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE                             +46 705 989668
Now I'm concentrating on a specific tank battle toward the end of World War II!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]