Subject: Re: Media type for PGP message? Date: Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:37:36AM -0700 Quoting ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > So why not work towards the use of RFC 3156 signatures instead? Especially > if your goal is to make this stuff more user-friendly. I support this -- 3156, for all its warts, alleged or true, is implemented in a few MUAs and works. FSVO works, but nothing else comes even close today. Mutt, my MUA, had a hell of grokking the first post; because the data between the PGP markers was quite far from parseable as cryptotext. It does that dreaded scanning, compared to which 3156 is elegant. Regards, -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 Now I'm concentrating on a specific tank battle toward the end of World War II!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature