Re: Proposed IESG structure change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/10/2014 13:59, Michael StJohns wrote:
...
>> I think MR's correct here: 3777 3.4 says,
>>
>>      The intent of this rule is to ensure that members of the IESG and
>>      IAB serve the number of years that best facilitates the review of
>>      one-half of the members each year.
>>
>> If a new AD position is created, I think doing a 3 year appointment is most consonant with 3777 3.4, but I don't think 1 year is forbidden.
> 
> You need to read it all.   Regular candidates serve a 2 or 3 year appointment.  Mid-term vacancy fillers serve between 1 to three years depending on when the vacancy occurs.   AFAIK we've never made a normal vacancy 1 year appointment.  And I think its been a while since we've had a 3 year term appointment.

I very much hope we can still apply common sense (with a rough consensus) when
we encounter a case that doesn't fit the letter of the rules.

'"If the law supposes that," said Mr. Bumble, squeezing his hat emphatically
in both hands, "the law is a ass - a idiot."' (Charles Dickens, Oliver Twist, 1838)

   Brian





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]