Re: Proposed IESG structure change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Great sentiment from Paul! IMO it is a sign of a healthy organization that
it can recognize and make these kinds of organizational changes.

As they say, adapt or die, change with the times, and don¹t be like the
ITU. ;-)


Jason

On 10/9/14, 1:36 AM, "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Paul,
>
>> As someone who has been active in Apps WGs for 20 years (sigh), I would
>>hate to see the area disappear, but that kind of thinking has caused the
>>IETF to hold on to other things much too long.
>
>I wanted to say that while we are talking about changing organisation, we
>are *not* abandoning any work. The number of WGs and topics fluctuates,
>but I cannot think of many more significant standards efforts at the
>moment than what we are doing with HTTP 2.0 for instance. Apps work is
>very important, and we continue to be happy to create new working groups
>and sponsor BOFs. However, we also feel that slightly bigger group of ADs
>would allow some flexibility to deal with the fluctuations, distribute
>workload better, etc. So - no disappearance but rather a change in form.
>
>Jari
>






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]