Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)

["Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@xxxxxxxxx>]

(reducing Ccs)

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Is the IESG system reviewing drafts without checking the IETF state per draft? If the IETF state of the draft is not submitted to IESG then the draft should not be reviewed.

Huh?  Why would you put a document in the datatracker in the first place if it shouldn't be reviewed?

-MSK