Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Martin Rex <mrex@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Article 2 "Definitions" of this EU directive (page 7 of above PDF)

  The following definitions shall also apply:
   (a) "user" means any natural person using a publicly available
       electronic communications service, for private or business
       purposes, without necessarily having subscribed to this
       service;

I am certainly no lawyer (are you?), but it seems to me that a corporate domain owner that chooses to use DMARC to protect its brand might have users within that domain -- employees, for instance.  I would claim that such an employer's email servers do not comprise "a publicly available electronic communications service", so I don't think employees using a protected domain are "users" under this definition.  And even if that doesn't wash, an employment contract (here, at least) typically grants the Article 5 consent that makes this point moot, and is not typically a "Click OK and forget" situation.

I imagine email service providers could secure the same sort of consent through a privacy policy, though "I had no idea" might be a more successful counter-argument there because nobody really reads those.

-MSK

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]