Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




  References
  ----------

  DMARC - http://dmarc.org
  SPF - RFC7208
  DKIM - RFC6376
  Internet Message Format - RFC5322
  OAR / Original Authentication Results -
     draft-kucherawy-original-authres
  Using DMARC -  draft-crocker-dmarc-bcp-03


This is missing two citations that I thought were supposed to be
included, since they touch on indirect email flows:

  Delegating DKIM Signing Authority - draft-kucherawy-dkim-delegate-00
  DKIM Third-Party Authorization Label - draft-otis-dkim-tpa-label-03

Why not ATPS RFC6541 production?


Consider ATPS the "lite version" of Doug's TPA. The same lookup hashing algorithm is used in both.  Further, there is real high quality commercial "running code" implementations supporting rfc6541.  All of our installations have DKIM+ADSP+ATPS out of the box with their primary domain used for automated first time setup plug and play readiness.

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]