On 7/15/2014 8:55 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I think, despite all your assertion by distant authorities, it may be that > something involving U/I requirements (not design, I agree that's out of scope) > may be part of the least bad solution we have to the problems the WG is going > to be chartered to solve. 1. What sort of 'proximity' do you require, before you can be swayed by authoritative information? 2. By 'least bad', it appears that you mean it is ok to standardize something that is known not to work, to the extent that the end user is expected to be part of the decision process. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net