Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>Of course people will suggest that we validate the personal name information. Because at the end of the
>day, spoofing is trying to make me believe that the message comes from "my friend Viktor" when in fact it
>does not. We may have perfect SPF, DKIM, DMARC and what have you, and still get spoofed messages "From:
>Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>." 

You know, that's what S/MIME with signed certificates is supposed to
do.  It's widely supported in MUAs and, well, meh.

R's,
John





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]