Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC

[Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxx>]

On 7/8/2014 1:09 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
> What's the problem?  How has the process been circumvented, in its
> letter or spirit?
>
> Nico

I guess the spirit; I had thought that the security community within the 
IETF had a more formal process for defining new terms, but also note 
that its glossary is "Informational" (not BCP).

So I withdraw that aspect of my objection; I'll post on the content 
separately.

Joe