On 4/14/14 9:23 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
Mediators, like mailing lists, take final delivery and post a new message. In formal terms, it's legitimate for them to create a different rfc5322.From field, including one that looks like some sort of 'rewrite' of the one used by the original author.
It's legitimate for a mailing list to rewrite the author, but it would be wrong. :-)
More seriously: If the mailing list wishes to express that I am the author of *this message*, then I belong in the "From:" field. That differs semantically from forwarding a message authored by me; then the list is saying that the list is the author, and it is simply quoting me, but that the list is the entity that should be considered to have written the message. For most mailing lists, that seems like the wrong semantics to try to convey.
There should be a mechanism for an author to send a message to a mailing list, granting the mailing list permission to redistribute that message, and have that permission conveyed to the mailing list recipient such that when the mailing list recipient receives the message, they can assure themselves that the originating domain is OK with that redistribution. Sounds like some protocol which could be written.
(If the originating domain is expressly *not* OK with the redistribution, the mailing list should bounce the message back to the author saying as much.)
pr -- Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478