Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Monday, March 31, 2014 08:36 +0100 Dave Cridland
<dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 31 March 2014 00:52, Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> the truth is, i have not used received: headers to
>> authenticate/debug [0] since yesterday.  but it's not yet
>> 09:00, so there is still time today.

> I'm assuming you realise that nobody is arguing that all
> received header fields be stripped?
> 
> The problem I've run into is generally machine [~auto]
> submitted email, where the network itself is "sensitive"
> (let's pretend it's a big bank), and the administrators don't
>...
> If there's a problem with the mail, the big bank can track
> down what happened easily enough, and you can point your
> finger at the correct big bank.

As I pointed out earlier, this is precisely the case for which
there is language in the message submission spec.  It has
nothing to do with SMTP across the network.

   john







[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]