Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
From: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:43:51 +0900
Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/w6FuUOfp6axsS51lca61aQBCmLE
Cc: IETF Disgust <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAMm+LwiOJZt9aqEmZDxPFkjvHdETMKGo1tik8ege94XfXu+j4g@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

> Debugging is not a justification for MUST.

do tell me where that is enshrined so the ietf ops community can go have
it fixed.

randy

References:
- SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  - From: Kevin M. Gallagher
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  - From: John Levine
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  - From: Phillip Hallam-Baker

Prev by Date: Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
Next by Date: Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
Previous by thread: Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
Next by thread: Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]