Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 12:43:42 -0400
Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xKRp5P61GLsr8Dg9z378kSUQ4ss
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5336F1EF.1020203@dcrocker.net>

I think the privacy beach from exposing intermediate steps is small, and in some cases knowledge of the routing may be required by law.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  - From: John Levine
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  - From: Hector Santos

References:
- SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  - From: Kevin M. Gallagher
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  - From: Eliot Lear
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  - From: Ted Lemon
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
Next by Date: Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
Previous by thread: Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
Next by thread: Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]