Pete, On 03/18/2014 11:00 PM, Pete Resnick wrote: > > So I think the ability to have an (exceptional) process for dealing with > incidents privately is necessary. I hope that we can come to consensus > that having some set of folks in place for these (hopefully exceedingly > exceptional) circumstances, who (in the most exceptional of these > circumstances) have the power to ... I like the parentheticals there and would love to see those or equivalent statements in the draft. I also think those quite reasonably imply that its in the nature of the ombudsfolk role, as envisaged, that if they are busy, then the setup has failed and we should revisit the scheme. If the above or similar were incorporated in the draft that would I think be good. S.