Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 20:06:56 -0400
Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Y0gYy59EARKAbr3OTsJL-siEzwg
Cc: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Pete Resnick <presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <532788CF.1060706@cs.tcd.ie>

An ombudsperson tries not to bring a situation to "justice" or any other public exposure (to start with), and from what I've seen most cases can be worked out without. Are you getting advice from professionals on how to structure this?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01
  - From: Dave Crocker

References:
- Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01
  - From: Mary Barnes
- RE: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01
  - From: Adrian Farrel
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01
  - From: Stephen Farrell

Prev by Date: Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01
Next by Date: Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01
Previous by thread: Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01
Next by thread: Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]