Re: Stopping at two

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+1

I think this question of English or no, in the IETF is an outdated issue.

On the other hand, if a non-native English writes or speaks something is
natural that some mistakes are made. The native English should have a
little patience. If we lack patience (or cooperation), and the question
is relevant to the IETF, I think the big loser is the IETF.

And, I repeat my last post correcting the possible confusion with the
Ombudsperson:

If the problems created by non-native English are so great as well (I
don't think it is), then recommend a solution : ... the IETF can create
a group of volunteers who act as mentors for non-native English (
particularly ) when they make a mistake that eventually bother some
participants or demonstrate the need for a follow up for some time. But,
it seems that this mechanism already exists, as has been said here in
the list .

Incidentally, I witnessed people IETF initiatives in this direction,
anonymously. This gave great results.

Em 10/03/2014 09:55, Yoav Nir escreveu:
> English is not my native language, but I don't see an alternative.
> People all over the world learn English as a second language. More so
> than any other language. Unless you want to get us all speaking
> Esperanto or lojban, English is the most practical.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]