Re: Stopping at two (was: Two official work languages is smarter)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In practical terms. I walk into a room discussing (just picking a wg or bof
> at random) "tunneling compressed multiplexed traffic".  Suppose I knew
> anything about this and had some slides:
>  - what language would those slides be in?
>  - what language would the draft that the slides are talking about be in?
>  - In what language am I talking about the draft or the slides?
>  - The people running to the mike telling me that I, in fact, do not know
> anything about this, what language do they speak?
>
> If the answer to all these questions is English, what does this flexibility
> mean?
> If the answer is that there will be a whole bunch of languages, how are we
> going to communicate?
>
> English is not my native language, but I don't see an alternative. People
> all over the world learn English as a second language. More so than any
> other language. Unless you want to get us all speaking Esperanto or lojban,
> English is the most practical.
>
> Yoav
>

+1.  English is not my native language neither, but I do not see any
other practical solutions (Esperanto jokes aside).

Riccardo





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]