Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"

[Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx>]

The most important comment for me as start message is that the 1st April RFC should be categorised different than IETF standards. IMHO, The past RFC style is not a reasonable style of the world or the future best practices. In considering our standards business and our documents reputation, we should not make jokes with our followers only if we are sure all like such jokes.

I don't want to stop that Style type, but it should be easily discriminated by readers/users from other real work/business. 

AB

It is nice that the last call is in 2 April not first of April, otherwise I will think this message was just fun also ;-)

On Tuesday, March 4, 2014, IAB Chair wrote:

This is a call for review of "RFC Style Guide" prior to potential
approval as an IAB stream RFC.

The document is available for inspection here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-styleguide/

The Call for Review will last until 2 April 2014.
Normally, we ask for comments to go to the IAB mail list, but for
this document, it is more appropriate to use the RFC Interest list.
Please send comments to rfc-interest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

On behalf of the IAB,
Russ Housley
IAB Chair