At 12:49 AM 2/24/2014, l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Abdussalam
you write:
> I suggest in London that you assign only maximum 10 minutes
present per WG draft and maximum 5 minute for individual draft (as
limit policy).
> We need to use more input and have more face2face (F2F)
discussion in our meeting.
How many IETF meetings have you attended, and what experience do you
base this recommendation on?
further, what if there are only two IDs active in a WG and the chairs
were given an hour or two hour slot because there are LOTS of open
questions that do not seem to be getting resolved on the mailing list
even though there have been a fair amount of discussion on both
drafts on the list? Would you still recommend only 30 minutes of
total meeting time? Seems like it, or do you give the chairs the
discretion to allocate time as they see fit?
James
(been a chair for 9 years)
Lloyd Wood
http://about.me/lloydwood
________________________________________
From: ietf [ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Abdussalam Baryun
[abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 24 February 2014 03:43
To: ietf
Subject: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations
and face2face discussions
Dear IETF WGs' Chairs,
I suggest in London that you assign only maximum 10 minutes present
per WG draft and maximum 5 minute for individual draft (as limit
policy). We need to use more input and have more face2face (F2F)
discussion in our meeting. I remember we discussed this before but
it will be nice if we know what chairs are thinking before few days
of the meeting.
Meeting time is money and that we need to improve the use of IETF
times within F2F WG discussions and decisions. If an author cannot
describe issues of draft in 10 minutes then it will be difficult for
the WG listeners to discuss and make decisions within another 10
minutes per item. Please comment.
Best wishes,
Abdussalam
WG Meetings are needed for group interactions and group decisions
not individual presentations or individual decisions.