Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures)
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 09:34:14 -0500
Archived-at: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/U_5b7BqgKDzvGnmvkzFeyhMgH8o
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <530A03BF.7060403@dcrocker.net>

Yes, lots of public institutions in the USA have gone to ombudsperson, as has the UN in New York. But it's a poor portmanteau. Best to start again with a gender-neutral word in any language.

How about just mediator?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures)
  - From: Yoav Nir

References:
- anti-harassment procedures
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures)
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures)
  - From: Patrik Fältström
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures)
  - From: Ted Lemon
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures)
  - From: Patrik Fältström
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures)
  - From: Ted Lemon
- Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures)
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures)
Next by Date: Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures)
Previous by thread: Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures)
Next by thread: Re: Basic Issues (was Re: anti-harassment procedures)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]