On 2/18/14 5:47 PM, "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Finally there are people suggesting that CBOR is the IETF version of JSON >in Binary. It isn't and now it never can be. Not least because it does >not follow the JSON data model and thus isn't technically >interchangeable. It is not possible to go back and create consensus after >people are told 'this is our ball, we choose who we are going to play >with' as happened in this case. Barry, can you add a little more clarity on this point, please? Does your decision mean that we shall not ever normatively reference CBOR in future protocols? -- Joe Hildebrand