Re: Last Call: <draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09.txt> (Cisco Specific Information Elements reused in IPFIX) to Informational RFC

[Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx>]

I think the draft should say on top that it updates RFC7012, as it mentions that the draft extends the information model in 7012. Otherwise please explain why not?

AB

On Thursday, February 13, 2014, joel jaeggli wrote:

A new version of this document has been released.

this addresses comments recieved during last call.

the diff1 is here

http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-10.txt

On 1/21/14, 4:33 AM, The IESG wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the following document:
> - 'Cisco Specific Information Elements reused in IPFIX'
>   <draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09.txt> as Informational RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2014-02-18. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>    This document describes some additional Information Elements of Cisco
>    Systems, Inc. that are not listed in RFC3954.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>