This new text doesn't fix the main problem, which is the failure to distinguish between your/your employer's IP and third party IP. As such, it's still wrong and needs further work. Ned > The IESG would like to put forward a revision to the proposed new Note > Well, after some discussion both on the IETF list [1] and within the IESG. > The revised text can be found on the IESG wiki: > <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/DraftNoteWellSummary> > The only change is the following: > OLD: "..., you must disclose that fact" > NEW: "..., you must disclose that fact, *or not participate in the > discussion*" > This is intended to reflect that BCP 79's requirements for disclosure apply > to "Any individual participating in an IETF discussion", as opposed to all > IETF participants. > If you have any further comments on this text, please reply in this thread. > Thanks, > --Richard > [1] <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg85658.html> > [2] <http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp79#section-6.1.2>